Bring screening into the verification flow.

Identity verification and AML screening answer different questions. A connected workflow makes the evidence easier to review together.

Bring screening into the verification flow.

Identity verification establishes who a customer is. AML screening adds risk information around that identity, including sanctions, politically exposed person (PEP) and adverse-record checks.

For regulated onboarding teams, the value is in reviewing those answers together. A sourced identity result and a screening result need to be connected to the same customer record.

The questions behind a screening request

  • Is there a potential sanctions-list match that needs review?
  • Does the customer’s PEP status call for additional due diligence?
  • Is there relevant adverse information that changes the risk assessment?

Fill Easy’s verification offering includes screening alongside identity and company checks, so teams can discuss the required sources and returned evidence within one integration plan.

Define the review, then the integration

A useful starting point is the institution’s customer type, operating markets and escalation process. Those determine which checks belong in onboarding, what information a reviewer needs and how the result should enter the existing workflow.

Screening supports that review. The institution’s risk policy and decision process remain the context for interpreting the result.

Move your search orders without changing how your team works.

Talk to sales
Send a test order

Send a test order

Tell us what to search. The agent replies to your work email with the price and turnaround, then the documents.

We use these details to reply to your test order. Privacy Policy

Prefer your own email app?